The Hidden Costs of Self-Managing Commercial Property or Hiring a Cheap Property Manager

Owning commercial property can be a lucrative investment, offering long-term returns and a steady source of passive income. However, the management of such properties is a complex task that can make or break your success as a property owner. Many property owners decide to self-manage or opt for the cheapest property manager available, thinking they’re saving money. However, this often ends up costing more in the long run. Here's why:

1. Time is Money

Self-managing a commercial property is not just about collecting rent. There are repairs, maintenance, tenant complaints, lease renewals, and a plethora of other tasks to handle. If you're spending a significant amount of time managing the property, you're diverting attention from other potential income-generating activities. Moreover, without specialized knowledge, these tasks can take longer than necessary, leading to inefficiencies.

2. Costly Mistakes Due to Lack of Expertise

A bad property manager or an owner who isn't well-versed in property management can make mistakes, such as:

• Misunderstanding local regulations and codes, leading to penalties or legal action.

• Poor tenant screening processes, resulting in frequent turnover or delinquent payments.

• Failing to address maintenance issues promptly, causing more extensive damage.

Such mistakes can result in significant financial losses that can easily offset any perceived savings from self-management or hiring a low-cost property manager.

3. Reduced Tenant Retention

High tenant turnover is expensive. Finding new tenants requires marketing, screening, and often making improvements or repairs to the property. A bad property manager might not address tenant concerns promptly, leading to dissatisfaction. A happy tenant is more likely to renew their lease, saving you money in the long run.

4. Lack of Access to Preferred Vendors

Established property management companies often have relationships with vendors, contractors, and suppliers. They can negotiate bulk rates or get discounts due to the volume of business they bring, savings that are passed on to you. A bad property manager or a self-managing owner might not have these relationships, leading to higher costs for repairs and maintenance.

5. Potential for Lower Rental Rates

A seasoned property manager has an in-depth understanding of the local market. They know the going rates and can advise on the best price points to ensure competitiveness without underselling. In contrast, a bad manager or self-managing owner might set rates based on gut feelings or outdated data, potentially leaving money on the table.

6. Risk of Legal Issues

From evictions to lease agreements, commercial property management involves numerous legal processes. A slip-up in any of these areas can land you in court, with hefty legal fees and potential settlements. An experienced property management firm is well-versed in these areas and can help avoid such pitfalls.

7. Inefficient Rent Collection

Efficient rent collection is crucial for maintaining a steady cash flow. A bad property manager may not have systems in place to ensure prompt payment, while a self-managing owner might find it awkward to chase down delinquent tenants. Established property management companies typically have rigorous rent collection processes, ensuring consistent income.

So, while it might seem cost-effective to self-manage your commercial property or hire a cheaper property manager, the hidden costs can quickly add up, affecting your bottom line. Outsourcing property management to a reputable, experienced firm might seem like an added expense, but the long-term benefits, including increased profits, peace of mind, and time savings, make it a worthy investment.